Skip to main content

The Pot Calling The Kettle Black

Pakistan board blasts ICC's Speed

CricInfo reports:

Pakistan board blasts Speed's remarks

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has taken strong objection to the recent remarks of Malcolm Speed, the ICC chief executive, about Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Asif with regards to the doping issue, calling them "unwarranted" and "irresponsible". The board has sent an official letter of protest to the ICC.

Speed, while talking about the ICC's policy of targeted dope tests in the forthcoming World Cup, had called the whole affair of Shoaib and Asif continuing to play cricket after having tested positive for a banned anabolic steroid an "embarrassment" for the game.

Nasim Ashraf, the PCB chairman, told Cricinfo, that Speed's comments were uncalled for and inflammatory. "The board takes strong objection to the irresponsible remarks by Malcolm Speed to a case that is subjudice," said Ashraf, referring to the fact that the overturning of the bans on both players was referred to the International Court of Sports Arbitration by WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency).

"Both players were voluntarily dope-tested and withdrawn from the Champions Trophy after which the due legal process of the PCB's anti-doping code was strictly followed," added Ashraf. "They were let off by an appellate tribunal after which the ICC has admitted it had no legal grounds over the case. WADA has filed a case over it and the matter is now subjudice. These remarks then are utterly irresponsible and unwarranted."

Nasim Ashraf is right. ICC and Speed have been terribly irresponsible. In fact, ICC and Speed have brought the game into disrepute too.

1. ICC should have banned both the players - as soon as the results came out.

2. By conducting the doping Tests ahead of the ICC Champions trophy (where doping is an offence), PCB had pre-empted a mandatory ICC Ban. (The argument that both the players voluntarily dope-tested is a big joke)

3. ICC should have banned Pakistan for six months for bringing the game into disrepute. (If Zimbabwe could be suspended, why not Pakistan?)

Now that the Pot has called the Kettle black, it will be interesting if WADA would come down heavily on the ICC and PCB. Talking about Pot... In 1986, when Ian Botham confessed to smoking pot, which is not a performance enhancing drug (if at all, smoking pot makes your performance to go down!) - he was banned from all forms of cricket for six months by the then English board.

When Shane Warne was caught with diuretic in his piss at the beginning of the 2003 WC, he was duly banned for a year.

How the ^&*k can PCB and then ICC not take any action against the two players?

What Pakistan needs is players like Mohd Yousuf, who is an honest cricketer. The cheats and the cover-up artists have to be banned. Now.


Popular posts from this blog

Arundhati Roy: The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize lecture

The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize lecture delivered by Arundhati Roy, at the Seymour Theatre Centre, University of Sydney.

Peace & The New Corporate Liberation Theology

It's official now. The Sydney Peace Foundation is neck deep in the business of gambling and calculated risk. Last year, very courageously, it chose Dr Hanan Ashrawi of Palestine for the Sydney Peace Prize. And, as if that were not enough, this year - of all the people in the world - it goes and chooses me!

However I'd like to make a complaint. My sources inform me that Dr Ashrawi had a picket all to herself. This is discriminatory. I demand equal treatment for all Peace Prizees. May I formally request the Foundation to organize a picket against me after the lecture? From what I've heard, it shouldn't be hard to organize. If this is insufficient notice, then tomorrow will suit me just as well.

When this year's Sydney Peace Prize was announced, I was subjected to some pretty arch remarks from those who k…

Decorporatising Jawaharlal Nehru University campus

Dear friends,

Kindly mail the text that follows to these email addresses:;;;;;;;

+++++++++++++ snip +++++++++

I support Students' Solidarity and the larger collective, Forum Against Corporatisation, in their fight to reclaim their campus space from big corporations like Nestle and to hand it over to more deserving local entrepreneurs.

Previously local entrepreneurs and those from the socially deprived sections of the society were given preferential access to campus space, but increasingly small businesses are being driven out, and larger corporations welcomed in. Nestle is only one particularly bad example: the company has violated workers' rights and supported the violent suppression of workers' unions in countries like Colombia, Philippines and Thailand; acquired cocoa for its cho…