Skip to main content

Doing justice to life

-- Rachel

Medha Patkar along with Bhagvati bhai and Jam Singh bhai of Narmada Valley has today entered the 20th day of their hunger strike. As you all must know, the government, disregarding the Supreme Court verdict wants to raise the height of Sardar Sarovar by 17 feet, which will displace 35000 families depriving them of their livelihood in the process. The NBA's struggle started in the 1980 s. Their constructive proposals for alternate 'development' models were met with hostility over the years. They had to make huge compromises, but had small successes and still are holding on. The current demand is the rehabilitation of those who will be displaced- i.e. they are demanding their Right to Life and livelihood.

You all know the details of displacement. But, living in Kerala I was not quite prepared for the inhumanity that is Indian state. The government has literally turned its face on the struggle that is happening for about a month now right under its nose. The Prime Minister thinks it is not necessary even to make a statement.

The NBA s method is peaceful resistance and now they are not in a position to move back from that. Medha s health is worsening. Forcefully arrested and hospitalized she has refused to take the IV. Bhagavati is still in the footpath of Jantar Mantar with other activists. She is experiencing pain and has lost her voice. The media which had lost its interest in the whole issue has revived some of it by involvement of those like Amir Khan, Swami Agnivesh and Arundhati Roy. But the state does not care. I was there only four times. And I was seldom more than an observer. Even then the stony silence you meet with is frustrating. You feel you are banging your head on a wall.

The State makes its face visible through the Police force. And I have seen when they react. One day the protestors blocked Janpath and danced for half an hour. When the Vehicles could n move and the car owners frowned, the state was irritated. Yesterday 50 of us went to the PM s house to give a memorandum. While the PM was too happy to receive the earlier BJP delegation, our audacity to infringe on the sacred space was not tolerated. We were arrested and removed and later released due to left intervention. We had committed the crime of violating orders of prohibition (under section188). And they wanted to search us as though v were a bunch of pick pockets. (That we resisted)

I am not articulate enough to respond to HariKuttans earlier questions to modes of protest. What the protests create might be a passing discomfort to the advantaged middle class including myself... the enormity of violence that the state does to the life of these thousands of disadvantaged is much much beyond that. When we say that resistance has to be limited to a zone where it does not really interfere with any thing, we are closing our eyes on that aspect. Knowing or unknowing the middle class we belong to along with the state are active agents of violence. What do a bunch of poor or displaced or grieved mean to us or to the state as long as the daily routine of those that matter remain unaffected!

Apart from a brief period when I was quite small I never felt a part of the political entity called India. Now, it is a constant presence in me- one of fear and repression and anger. I might go back soon to the cocoon of comfort. But at least now I am nauseated by own passivity. I think the NBA activists who have been resisting for over 20 years have done more justice to their lives than I have.

PS. I got to know of the Supreme Court of Justice has given the green signal to continue construction.

To find out more about Narmada - Or click here


This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

Arundhati Roy: The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize lecture

The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize lecture delivered by Arundhati Roy, at the Seymour Theatre Centre, University of Sydney.

Peace & The New Corporate Liberation Theology

It's official now. The Sydney Peace Foundation is neck deep in the business of gambling and calculated risk. Last year, very courageously, it chose Dr Hanan Ashrawi of Palestine for the Sydney Peace Prize. And, as if that were not enough, this year - of all the people in the world - it goes and chooses me!

However I'd like to make a complaint. My sources inform me that Dr Ashrawi had a picket all to herself. This is discriminatory. I demand equal treatment for all Peace Prizees. May I formally request the Foundation to organize a picket against me after the lecture? From what I've heard, it shouldn't be hard to organize. If this is insufficient notice, then tomorrow will suit me just as well.

When this year's Sydney Peace Prize was announced, I was subjected to some pretty arch remarks from those who k…

Thirst for blood and oil

There is a war going on in the Middle East; one in Iraq and the other in Lebanon. It is a war against innocent civilian population, played out by faceless enemies of humanity. Is it only a war in the name of religion, gods, and land? It is also a war in the name of black gold – OIL!

The United States and Britain are only too happy to occupy Iraq and see various parts of it blow up. Iraq's sin is that it has a lot of Oil. But, then, Iraqis are not enough educated and sophisticated people to understand that no one really cares about whether it is Shia oil or Sunni oil. It is a crying shame that Iraqis kill each other in the name of the two factions of Islam – again their only reason for killing is to set the supremacy – and to gain power. Saddam knew too well that Oil was more powerful than anything else in today's world. And Oil is the very reason why he was toppled and put behind bars. It wasn't Saddam's Human Rights violations that the Western governments were too con…

Where the People Voted Against Fear

by Eduardo Galeano; Inter Press Service; November 18, 2004

A few days before the election of the President of the planet in North America, in South America elections and a plebiscite were held in a little-known, almost secret country called Uruguay. In these elections, for the first time in the country's history, the left won. And in the plebiscite, for the first time in world history, the privatization of water was rejected by popular vote, asserting that water is the right of all people.

* * *

The movement headed by President-elect Tabare Vazquez ended the monopoly of the two traditional parties--the Blanco and the Colorado parties--which governed Uruguay since the creation of the universe.

And after each election you would hear this exclamation: 'I thought that we Blancos won but it turns out we Colorados did"--or the other way around. Out of opportunism, yes, but also because after so many years of ruling together, the two parties had fused into one, disguised as two.