Skip to main content

BP charged with US price-fixing



Mark Tran
Thursday June 29, 2006
BP's image in the US today took another knock as the British oil giant faced a lawsuit alleging that it made large profits by cornering the propane market.

The US authorities have accused the British oil giant of buying up large amounts of propane in February 2004. The move pushed up prices by more than 40% to about 90 cents a gallon and netted BP £20m in profits.

According to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), BP traders - with the consent of senior management - bought "enormous quantities of propane" to establish a "dominant and controlling" position in the market and then held back supplies from the market in order to boost prices.



BP logo
BP logo.

Propane is used by around 7m households in the US to heat trailer and rural homes and fuel cookers. It is also heavily used by industry.

BP denied any wrongdoing, but one former BP trader, 34-year-old Dennis Abbott, of Houston, yesterday pleaded guilty in a federal district court in Washington to taking part in a conspiracy "to manipulate and corner the propane market".

Abbott, who has agreed to cooperate in a continuing criminal investigation being conducted by the FBI, faces up to five years in prison and a fine of $250,000 (£138,000).

BP said "market manipulation did not occur" and that the company intended to fight the charges in court. However, it said an internal investigation conducted by BP found that several employees had "failed to adhere to BP policies governing trading activities" and had been dismissed.

"Cornering a commodity market is more than a threat to market integrity," said Gregory Mocek, the CFTC's director of enforcement. "It is an illegal activity that could have repercussions for commercial market participants as well as retail consumers around this country."

The CFTC alleges that February 2004 was not the first time that BP had engaged in an effort to corner the propane market. It said BP attempted to manipulate the price of propane in April 2003 through a similar strategy.

The CFTC lawsuit alleges that a BP employee described the April 2003 incident as a "trial run" for the February 2004 strategy.

This is the second blow to BP's reputation in the US this month. In early June, the company admitted it was facing a criminal inquiry into a massive oil spill in Alaska, described by environmentalists as a "catastrophe".

BP, which has sought to project an image of environmental responsibility, received a subpoena on April 26 from a federal grand jury in Alaska. But it only revealed the investigation, which could lead to prison sentences, after an internal email was leaked to journalists.

Revelations about the investigation into the spill of 1.2m litres of crude into the Prudhoe Bay area in March followed a fire and 15 deaths at its Texas City refinery and a rig capsizing in the Gulf of Mexico.

The latest legal setback had little effect on BP's shares, which were virtually unchanged in morning trading at 615.62p.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Arundhati Roy: The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize lecture

The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize lecture delivered by Arundhati Roy, at the Seymour Theatre Centre, University of Sydney. Peace & The New Corporate Liberation Theology It's official now. The Sydney Peace Foundation is neck deep in the business of gambling and calculated risk. Last year, very courageously, it chose Dr Hanan Ashrawi of Palestine for the Sydney Peace Prize. And, as if that were not enough, this year - of all the people in the world - it goes and chooses me! However I'd like to make a complaint. My sources inform me that Dr Ashrawi had a picket all to herself. This is discriminatory. I demand equal treatment for all Peace Prizees. May I formally request the Foundation to organize a picket against me after the lecture? From what I've heard, it shouldn't be hard to organize. If this is insufficient notice, then tomorrow will suit me just as well. When this year's Sydney Peace Prize was announced, I was subjected to some pretty arch rema

"Global Doubts as Global Solutions"

by Amartya Sen Melbourne Town Hall Tuesday, May 15, 2001, 6pm 1. Misery and Resignation We live in a world of unprecedented prosperity - incomparably richer than ever before. The massive command over resources, knowledge and technology that we now take for granted would be hard for our ancestors to imagine. But ours is also a world of extraordinary deprivation and of staggering inequality. An astonishing number of children are ill nourished and illiterate as well as ill cared and needlessly ill. Millions perish every week from diseases that can be completely eliminated, or at least prevented from killing people with abandon. The world in which we live is both remarkably comfortable and thoroughly miserable. Faced with this dual recognition, we can go in one of several different directions. One line of thinking takes the form of arguing that the combination of processes that has led to the prosperity of some will lead to similar prosperity for all. The advocacy of this perspective c

How not to manufacture patriotism

by TJS George Was anyone patriotically inspired by this year's Republic Day speeches? Or any year's for that matter. Or by any of the Independence Day speeches over the years. These have become mere rituals. Rituals do not inspire. This is not necessarily the fault of our leaders. Speeches that lift the souls of listeners have been heard only rarely in history. The occasion, the mood, the speaker's personality and convictions are all decisive in giving a speech lasting impact. As Macaulay's children know, Edmund Burke made many a memorable speech. But none of them acquired the stamp of greatness that a short speech by Abraham Lincoln did _ the Gettysburg address. Pre-independence India bristled with great scholars, orators and visionaries. None made the impact Vivekananda did at the Parliament of Religions with the opening words, "Sisters and brothers of America .... I thank you in the name of the mother of religions. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan could hold