Skip to main content

Democrats Cry Foul, Urge Vote Inquiry

By WILLIAM MARCH
wmarch@tampatrib.com


TAMPA - It's more a ripple than a tidal wave, but in a growing stream of e-mail and Internet chat, John Kerry partisans are suggesting that last week's election was hacked, distorted, stolen or somehow marred by fraud.

The electronic squawks focus on Florida and Ohio, the two states thought to have decided the contest between Kerry and President Bush.

The rumblings have obtained little official credence, though some experts say the issue should be addressed if only to assure confidence in the election system.

Six congressional Democrats, including Rep. Robert Wexler of Boca Raton, have called for a federal investigation of the scattered reports of voting irregularities and seemingly anomalous results that have fueled the rumors.

Their letter to the General Accounting Office ``is saying we have some questions and we want to make sure we're conducting the fairest, most equitable election possible,'' said Lale Mamaux, a spokeswoman for Wexler, who was in Israel on Wednesday. ``We need a fair, nonpartisan organization coming out there and saying yes or no.''

The Internet talk is fueled in part by some documented election irregularities, and in part by speculation.

* In Ohio, an error with an electronic voting system in suburban Columbus gave Bush 4,258 votes to Kerry's 260 - in a precinct where only 638 voters cast ballots. That error, officials said, was caught and rectified.

* In Florida, a Broward County tally of votes on the state gambling initiative failed to record thousands of ballots.

* In North Carolina, more than 4,000 votes in one rural county were lost irretrievably when election workers mishandled a voting machine.

Election Day exit polls that wrongly called the race for Kerry are being cited as evidence that there was tampering with the results.

In one widely circulated article, CommonDreams.org, a liberal online site, quoted comments by conservative- leaning pollster Dick Morris saying: ``Exit polls are almost never wrong.''

Morris concluded that in this case, however, the polls were wrong.

Bill Bucolo, a St. Petersburg political activist who has been assembling and disseminating Internet-based information and e-mail on the subject, said public faith in the election system is at stake.

``There's a lot of evidence that too much happened in this election to take for granted that it was an honest election,'' he said. ``There's a feeling of loss and grievance, that the country's gone down the tubes because we can't believe in our elections any more.''

Political experts tend to dismiss the idea.

The conspiracy theorists should ``take a Valium and go to bed,'' said political scientist Darryl Paulson of the University of South Florida. ``These folks are in denial.''

The most important contention concerning Florida appears to be that Bush got disproportionate numbers of votes in counties that use optical-scan ballots.

Hacking Allegations

The outcomes are cited in optical-scan counties that have large numbers of registered Democrats but that voted heavily for Bush. The suggestion is that the computers used to count optical-scan ballots may have been hacked.

Many of the counties are small, rural places in North Florida. Many large, urban counties use touch-screen machines, and in those larger counties, voting more closely tracked party registration.

In their call for an investigation, the members of Congress cited ``a substantial drop-off in Democratic votes in proportion to voter registration in counties utilizing optical scan machines.''

Dixie County, for example, had 7,495 registered Democrats and 1,454 Republicans, but it voted more than 2-to-1 for Bush, 4,433 to 1,959.

In Union County, there were 5,331 Democrats to 1,291 Republicans, but the county went for Bush over Kerry by 3,396 to 1,251.

Even some leading Democrats in those counties said that's not fraud, though.

It has more to do with primary elections closed to all but registered party members, they said. In a vestige of the Democratic Solid South, a Democratic primary often decides local elections in those counties.

``That means you have to be a registered Democrat if you want to vote on any of your local officials,'' said Don Hicks, Union County Democratic Party chairman.

Union elected three county commissioners this year, for example, but none of the races was on the general election ballot because no Republican ran.

As a result, Hicks said, Union is full of registered Democrats who side with the GOP outside local matters.

``There's no fraud in my county. I'm adamant about that,'' he said.

Dubious Democrats

Arthur Pinner, Dixie County Democratic chairman, took the argument further. He voted personally for Bush, he said, ``on account of his morals.''

Kerry ``was a liberal way down the road; he believed in same-sex marriage and abortion,'' Pinner said. ``It came out in all the magazines.''

Pinner couldn't name which magazines reported that - in fact, Kerry opposes gay marriage - before clarifying that his source wasn't a magazine.

``Pamphlets that was passed out in church,'' he said. He wasn't sure whom the pamphlets came from, but said, ``I believed them enough so I didn't vote for him.''

Jenny Nash, spokeswoman for the Florida Division of Elections, said the allegations of fraud are wrong.

``These groups prior to the election were trying to plant doubt in voters' minds pertaining to touch screens,'' and they've switched to optical- scan machines, she said. ``If you look at the statistical history, the voting results were similar to past elections.''

Reporter William March can be reached at (813) 259-7761.

This story can be found at: http://news.tbo.com/news/MGBE572GE1E.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Arundhati Roy: The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize lecture

The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize lecture delivered by Arundhati Roy, at the Seymour Theatre Centre, University of Sydney. Peace & The New Corporate Liberation Theology It's official now. The Sydney Peace Foundation is neck deep in the business of gambling and calculated risk. Last year, very courageously, it chose Dr Hanan Ashrawi of Palestine for the Sydney Peace Prize. And, as if that were not enough, this year - of all the people in the world - it goes and chooses me! However I'd like to make a complaint. My sources inform me that Dr Ashrawi had a picket all to herself. This is discriminatory. I demand equal treatment for all Peace Prizees. May I formally request the Foundation to organize a picket against me after the lecture? From what I've heard, it shouldn't be hard to organize. If this is insufficient notice, then tomorrow will suit me just as well. When this year's Sydney Peace Prize was announced, I was subjected to some pretty arch rema

"Global Doubts as Global Solutions"

by Amartya Sen Melbourne Town Hall Tuesday, May 15, 2001, 6pm 1. Misery and Resignation We live in a world of unprecedented prosperity - incomparably richer than ever before. The massive command over resources, knowledge and technology that we now take for granted would be hard for our ancestors to imagine. But ours is also a world of extraordinary deprivation and of staggering inequality. An astonishing number of children are ill nourished and illiterate as well as ill cared and needlessly ill. Millions perish every week from diseases that can be completely eliminated, or at least prevented from killing people with abandon. The world in which we live is both remarkably comfortable and thoroughly miserable. Faced with this dual recognition, we can go in one of several different directions. One line of thinking takes the form of arguing that the combination of processes that has led to the prosperity of some will lead to similar prosperity for all. The advocacy of this perspective c

How not to manufacture patriotism

by TJS George Was anyone patriotically inspired by this year's Republic Day speeches? Or any year's for that matter. Or by any of the Independence Day speeches over the years. These have become mere rituals. Rituals do not inspire. This is not necessarily the fault of our leaders. Speeches that lift the souls of listeners have been heard only rarely in history. The occasion, the mood, the speaker's personality and convictions are all decisive in giving a speech lasting impact. As Macaulay's children know, Edmund Burke made many a memorable speech. But none of them acquired the stamp of greatness that a short speech by Abraham Lincoln did _ the Gettysburg address. Pre-independence India bristled with great scholars, orators and visionaries. None made the impact Vivekananda did at the Parliament of Religions with the opening words, "Sisters and brothers of America .... I thank you in the name of the mother of religions. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan could hold